66 P.3d 1247

STATE OF ARIZONA v. CHRISTOPHER LEE CECIL

No. CR-02-0033-PRSupreme Court of Arizona.
April 22, 2003.

Prior report: 203 Ariz. 284, 53 P.3d 635.

ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

Page 71

FURTHER ORDERED: remanding for reconsideration in light of State v. Thompson, CR-01-0435-PR.

FURTHER ORDERED: Petition for Review = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Cross-Petition for Review = Denied.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 71 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 72

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 72 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 73

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 73 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 74

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 74 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 75

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 75 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 76

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 76 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 77

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 77 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 78

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGES 78 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 79

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 79 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 80

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 80 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 81

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 81 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 82

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 82 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 83

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 83 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 84

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 84 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 85

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON PAGE 85 WAS WITHDRAWN.]

Page 86

Tagged: