899 P.2d 162
No. CV-94-0152-PR.Supreme Court of Arizona.
July 14, 1995.
ORDER
The Court previously granted review of this case. On further consideration, in view of footnote 1 in the Court of Appeals’ opinion and the concession made at oral argument to this Court by counsel for the Plaintiffs-in-Intervention that nonliability-dependent coverage issues are not precluded or foreclosed by the Court of Appeals’ opinion, the Court concludes that the grant of review was improvident. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court of Appeals’ opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
SHANE NOEL JONES, A QUALIFIED ELECTOR; VICTORIA CRANFORD, A QUALIFIED ELECTOR AND RESIDENT OF GRAHAM…
228 Ariz. 495 268 P.3d 1152 627 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19 Manuel SALDATE, a married…
229 Ariz. 32 270 P.3d 859 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Michael Kevin PENNEY, Appellee.…
228 Ariz. 545 269 P.3d 721 628 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 41 DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF PIMA…
228 Ariz. 541 269 P.3d 717 The STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Daniel DIAZ, Petitioner.…
228 Ariz. 490 268 P.3d 1147 STAR PUBLISHING CO., an Arizona corporation, Petitioner, v. Hon.…