FRAZIER v. STATE, 37 Ariz. 259 (1930)

292 P. 1116

W.W. FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.

Criminal No. 723.Supreme Court of Arizona.
Filed December 1, 1930.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Greenlee. Dave W. Ling, Judge. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. W.W. Frazier, in pro. per.

Mr. K. Berry Peterson, Attorney General, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the second degree, and has appealed to this court. No brief has been filed on his behalf, but we have examined the record for fundamental error. The information properly charges the offense of which the defendant was convicted and the verdict of the jury found him guilty thereof. The minutes show that the proceedings on the trial were in all respects regular and according to law. While some of the instructions given were not applicable

Page 260

to the crime charged by the information, it is apparent from the record that the error was in no sense prejudicial.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 292 P. 1116

Recent Posts

JONES v. RESPECT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, 2 CA-CV 2022-0065 (Aug. 25, 2022)

SHANE NOEL JONES, A QUALIFIED ELECTOR; VICTORIA CRANFORD, A QUALIFIED ELECTOR AND RESIDENT OF GRAHAM…

3 years ago

SALDATE v. MONTGOMERY, 268 P.3d 1152 (2012)

228 Ariz. 495 268 P.3d 1152 627 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19 Manuel SALDATE, a married…

8 years ago

STATE v. PENNEY, 270 P.3d 859 (2012)

229 Ariz. 32 270 P.3d 859 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Michael Kevin PENNEY, Appellee.…

8 years ago

DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF PIMA COUNTY v. FORD, 269 P.3d 721 (2012)

228 Ariz. 545 269 P.3d 721 628 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 41 DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF PIMA…

8 years ago

STATE v. DIAZ, 269 P.3d 717 (2012)

228 Ariz. 541 269 P.3d 717 The STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Daniel DIAZ, Petitioner.…

8 years ago

STAR PUBLISHING CO. v. BERNINI, 268 P.3d 1147 (2012)

228 Ariz. 490 268 P.3d 1147 STAR PUBLISHING CO., an Arizona corporation, Petitioner, v. Hon.…

8 years ago